Please wait.
loading...
| Displaying all 3 messages |
|
Kenneth Ekman
8/23/2014 at 6:51
|
Hi,
In my C# based software I am using the immediate-family query to get a lot of information in as few queries as possible. It works well, however, I have so far only to parsed the data coming in focus->nodes->profile-XXXXX while ignoring data in focus->nodes->union-XXXXX as my C# data structure has not allowed me to do so. How do I create an IDictionary which can handle the case where any item in the nodes list can contain either a HttpPerson or a HttpPersonUnion object as below? public class HttpGetIndividualResult { public HttpPerson focus { get; set; } public IDictionary<string, ?????> nodes { get; set; } } public class HttpPerson { public string id { get; set; } public string url { get; set; } public bool @public { get; set; } public bool is_alive { get; set; } public string status { get; set; } public string name { get; set; } public string first_name { get; set; } public string middle_name { get; set; } public string maiden_name { get; set; } public string last_name { get; set; } public string display_name { get; set; } public string gender { get; set; } public string about_me { get; set; } public HttpEvent birth { get; set; } public HttpEvent death { get; set; } public HttpMugshotUrls mugshot_urls { get; set; } public IDictionary<string, HttpUnionRelation> edges { get; set; } } public class HttpPersonUnion { public string id { get; set; } public string url { get; set; } public string status { get; set; } public IDictionary<string, HttpUnionRelation> edges { get; set; } } public class HttpUnionRelation { public string rel { get; set; } } Regards, Kenneth |
|
|
Kenneth Ekman
8/24/2014 at 4:40
|
Just realized there was a sneaky (bordering on ugly) solution that could be used here...
Since the HttpPerson is a superset of the HttpPersonUnion I can use that one consistently... |
|
Frode Evensen
9/17/2014 at 2:32
|
Hopefully you got it working, if not then this page has a lot of tips:
http://www.tamurajones.net/TheGeniModel.xhtml |
Reply
Start a new discussion topic