ATTENTION Curators, please assist

Private User
Should we undo the merge you did few days ago?
https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=87312414010

Kyriakos Stavrou Neophytou
What should we check?
If you mean the proposed match:
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000218946419881?return=match%3B&to=6000000190799731885
than I think it is wrong and should be rejected.
One is Angelica Caroline, the other is Clara Johanna Caroline.
One husband was born on October 25, 1881, and the other husband on March 07, 1872.
You may also consult the other manager, Michael Gaardboe, but I think his answer will be the same.

Private User
merge undone.

Private User
Fixed by Private User

Kyriakos Stavrou Neophytou

Thank you for the reply.

If you want to refer to a specific post in a discussion, you can retrieve its address by clicking its time tag, like this
https://www.geni.com/discussions/286438?msg=1771220

Your post here is in the scope of the discussion, but is wasn't specific enough. Please specify what do you want us to check.

When other profile is in question, and you cannot see it due to privacy rules, you can try to contact the other manager. Sometime the other profile does not appear in the message you get, but there is a match indication (blue color) in the profile you manage that can provide you with more data.

Please undo https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=87261981220
Thank you.

Gintautas Grigelionis I have unmerged it

Please someone revert the following merge I did: https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=87292015580

Thank you.

Philipp E. Kafka -- Another curator did it a couple hours ago, sorry for the delay in letting you know

PTID:6000000218987084864:6000000218854084832 -- Mixed race families are common and racial categories often shift, especially on census documents. I would suggest working with the managers and consulting the sources as you discuss; it looks like they've uploaded some.

Private User
The recent merge looks valid.
https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=87338080880
Please consult the other manager, Private User and if indeed the mother is wrong - delete her. Curators are not required for such tree editing.

PTID:6000000218988747836:6000000218854084832

I agree that it is unlikely that the same man married Mary BURGESS, Nora and Ida

From her marriage record Susan was born in 1874 - parents Wm GENTRY and Nora
In 1880 William was living with Mary with children Sarah born 1871, Laura born 1872, Mary born 1873

I will add what sources I can and separate the William's

PTID:6000000218988747836:6000000218854084832 I seperated
William Alexander "Teak" Gentry who married Mary Louise BURGESS
from William Gentry who married Nora CARVER

I could not locate any sources for Ida Gentry so left her attached to William Alexander "Teak" Gentry

Adam Joseph Scott the request was only requested 2 days ago and the other manager is active - give them some time to approve the merge please

Private User
Thanks. I suggest that you add a note in the profile's "About me" text, send the manager a private message, and let him some more time to respond.

Kyriakos Stavrou Neophytou
You are replying just fine. In a post to a discussion, there is no "Reply" like in a message.
Usually we simply go back to the most recent post that mentions you, but you can include a link to the specific post {the time tag of every post is such a link}.
If you have a match comparison screen open, copy its address (URL) and post it.

Private User

Ieva Rubins has a son attached - Juris Rubins

Does he go with her or stay with Jēkabs Rubins

Is he a son of Annuža Anna Rubins or we don’t know yet?

Same question for the children attached to ? ?

Hubert de Vos - merge undone.