Bertrama fitz Ranulf

Ranulf Fitz Ranulf, Lord of Spennithorne, Co. York, Born ca 1220/5, died before 1294. Married Bertrama, widowof Sir Roger Ingoldsby. With this generation the Fitz Ranulf (Fitz Randal, Fitz Randolph) name became well established. Ranulf bore the Arms of his grandfather Glanville. Ranulf's decendants in the male line continued at Spennithorne until theearly part of the 16th century. Ranulf is the second son of Ranulf Fitz Robert (Randolph 1980 p-584)

• ________________
• http://our-royal-titled-noble-and-commoner-ancestors.com/p506.htm#i...
• 'Bertrama
• F
• ' Bertrama married Sir Ranulf FitzRanulf, Lord Spennithorne, son of Ranulf FitzRobert, Lord Middleham and Mary Bigod, circa 1248 at of Yorkshire, England.
• 'Family Sir Ranulf FitzRanulf, Lord Spennithorne b. bt 1220 - 1225, d. bt 1287 - 1294
• Child
  • ◦Ralph FitzRanulf, Lord Spennithorne+ d. b 1316
• _____________________

'The Magna Charta sureties, 1215: the barons named in the Magna Charta, 1215 ... By Frederick Lewis Weis, Walter Lee Sheppard, William

• http://books.google.com/books?id=59XcwoRK9jkC&pg=PA194&lpg=PA194&dq...
• Pg. 193-196
• 1. ROGER BIGOD (3-1), 2nd Earl of Norfolk, Magna Charta Surety, 1215, b. c. 1150, d. 1221; m. Ida. (CP IX, 586-589).
• 2. MARY BIGOD, heiress of Menethorpe, co. York; prob. m. Ranulf fitz Robert, lord of Middleham, co. York, to which he succeeded by 1206, d. bef. 7 Dec. 1252, bur. at Coverham Abbey, co. York; held 6 knights' fees in the honour of Richmond, co. York, and 6 in Norfolk, the latter acquired presumably from the Bigods. (Clay, Early Yorkshire Charters, V:303; The Genealogist, n.s. 3:33; Feudal Aids 6: 156; VCH, North Riding of York, 1: 254).
• '3. RANULF fitz RANULF, lord of Spennithorne, co. York, b. c. 1220/5, d. bef. 1294; m. Bertrama, widow of Sir Roger de Ingoldsby. (VCH cit. 1: 258).
• 4. RALPH fitz RANULF, lord of Spennithorne, b. c. 1250/60, d. bef. 1316; m. Theophania (or Tiffany) de Lascelles, dau. and coheiress of Sir Roger de Lascelles (IV) of Kirkby-under-Knowle, co. York, who is now considered by legal fiction to have been 1st Baron Lascelles. (VCH cit. 1: 258; Clay, Early Yorkshire Charters, "Lascelle Fee", V 182-186; CP VII, 446-449)
• _______________