![](https://assets11.geni.com/images/external/x_com_black_16.png?1730762363)
![](https://assets12.geni.com/images/facebook_white_small_short.gif?1730762363)
Not the child of Edward Sutton, 5th Baron Dudley & Elizabeth Tomlinson
Possibly Agnes Tomlinson, the daughter of William Tomlinson and Agnes Dues who was baptized at St. Thomas 25 Jun 1577. But whatever her first name, the wife of John Bagley was definitely a sister of Elizabeth Tomlinson.
Edward Bagley was the son of John Bagley (1571 - 1625) and Agnes Tomlinson (1577 - bef 1629)
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Tomlinson-1709
Agnes Tomlinson was baptized at St Thomas Church in Dudley, Worcester, England. [1] Her parents were William Tomlinson and Agnes Dues of Dudley.[2]
A small bequest in the will of Elizabeth Tomlinson, who was the mistress of Edward Sutton, 5th Baron Dudley, provides evidence that Elizabeth Tomlinson was the sister of the wife of John Bagley. Therefore, it has been determined that the wife of John Bagley was a daughter of William Tomlinson and Agnes Dues of Dudley, Worcester, England.
Besides Elizabeth Tomlinson, William Tomlinson / Tomlenson / Tumlenson of Dudley was the father of two other daughters, Jonne and Agnes:
Jonne Tomlinson was christened on 17 June 1569[3] Jonne Tomlinson married William Troughton in 1595. [4]
Agnes Tomlinson was christened on 25 June 1577.[5] By a process of elimination, Agnes has been determined the most likely candidate for the wife of John Bagley.
Marriage and Children
Although no marriage record has been located, it can be estimated that Agnes Tomlinson married John Bagley circa 1600. The baptism of their first known child was recorded on October 18, 1602 at St Edmonds church in Dudley, England.
Children of John Bagley and Agnes Tomlinson:
This lineage needs documentation. (See below)
Edward and his mistress Elizabeth did not have a daughter Ann.
Edward and his wife Theodosia had a daughter Ann who married Hans Meinhart von Schomberg.
src: www.tudorplace.com.ar/Sutton.htm#AnneSUTTON2
Please note: the above is speculation based on a wealth of circumstantial evidence, but has not yet been definitely proven or disproven from documents of that time, and may never be. I have spent several hours on this question and am currently gathering as many original documents as possible. I will try to post the whole story in my Mysteries section this Fall, but briefly: what was generally considered fact (the above) was thrown out the window in 1996 by Chas. Hansen when he discovered a reference to Edward Bagley's relation to Elizabeth Tomlinson (image courtesy of Linda J. Coate) as "nepoti() ex matre", which he translated as nephew. In Classical Latin, this was grandson, but in Medieval Latin, could have been either. There are at least two experts on both sides of this question. More interesting is that the clerk originally wrote "son" followed by some words I have not been able to decipher, and then crossed this out. On top of this, anyone who has worked with this sort of records knows how many mistakes they contain. Even if nephew was correct, there are at least two plausible theories that still connect Edward to Sutton, including the sister theory. Facts are (among many others too numerous to go into now) that John Bagley, after his marriage to the supposed Sutton child, was a Deerkeeper on Suttons estate and later managed the estate in place of one of the sons, that John was treated by Sutton equally with many of his other (illegitimate) sons (in law) in many documents & dealings, that Edward Bagley was named administrator of Elizabeth's estate, that Elizabeth left as many bequests to the Bagleys as to her other (proven) children, even giving John Jr. a house when he married, and that one of her sons contested this will, claiming that Sutton had influenced the bequests to the Bagleys. Also, John & wife named their first child Edward, and others Dudley and Elizabeth. Edward named one of his sons Sutton. It has been claimed that the Bagleys received more than Elizabeth's other children because these other children were otherwise taken care of. I now have copies of the original wills of some of these children as well as that of John (above). My preliminary conclusion is that John had nearly as much, if not more, to bequeath than some of the other "children". Loyal "servant" or son in law? We may never know. However, in my story based on what I know so far, the son-in-law theory rates a "more likely than not"! So to continue.
1577 |
June 25, 1577
|
Dudley, Worcester, England (United Kingdom)
|
|
1602 |
October 1, 1602
|
Dudley, Worcester, England (United Kingdom)
|
|
1603 |
December 1603
|
Sedgeley, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom
|
|
1604 |
1604
|
Sedgley, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom
|
|
1607 |
1607
|
Sedgley, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom
|
|
1613 |
July 1613
|
Sedgeley, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom
|
|
1629 |
1629
Age 51
|
St Edmunds, Dudley, Worcester , England (United Kingdom)
|
|
1998 |
August 22, 1998
Age 52
|
||
August 28, 1998
Age 52
|