Pope John Paul II ancestors

I particularily like the "<>" for people and the "." for others. Shouldn't this just be removed for the tree?

<>
her son
→
<> Emily
his daughter
→
<> ' Mikhaelia ' ?
her daughter
→
<> [Wlsh Snd] ' Baskeouet '?
her daughter
→
Ruitthee [Wlsh Snd]
her daughter
→
Ringoue [Wlsh Snd]
her son
→
Antony Bergeswithe
his son
→
.
his son
→
<>
his son
→
.
his son
→

I really think what is going on here is that Mr. Paracy added Karol Wojtyla as a relative of his, but failed to remove the relationship. This happens when a new profile is added that you have no relation. The new profile is added as a son, daughter, sister, etc. and then the relationship is removed forcing the new profile to a new tree seperate from you.

I have wrote to Jonathan a long time ago
Jonathan Edward Stanley Paracy
to ask that he break his relationship with Pope John Paul, but have not heard back and the relationship still remains.

Perhaps you can help with this or a curator. I would take care of this if I had the curator ability.......

Thanks

Looks like this has already been fixed.

I will not break the relationship. It was added by request ~ Honest.
"rockquest of the poperentdest in Italy" , They want that there, & I cannot place that brother of 'rits' Grandfather in the Tree or I would face 'contempt' to the path of Royalties of which I have maintained accuracy to the best of my abilities to avoid DIRECTLY claiming, and failed to merge albeit they are difficult to prove via 'Wars of Secrecies' in positions of Political Powers of greed & religion. ~(Those dangerous battles which make dormant lines.). I cannot prove it to you, but it remains Unchanged here in my PERSONAL Tree for 7 Generations. HUSBAND remains as my division to this relative. It would be wrong for me to claim he was my Genetic Father's brother, No?