Hello! I've not made a request like this before, so bear with me. I need the parentage removed for Catherine Anderson (Graham)
Catherine Anderson
Research I've done on multiple sites shows that the other Catherine Graham daughter of Lady Anne Graham (Howard) and Richard Graham married William Widdrington, 4th Baron Widdrington. One example:
http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Widdrington1643.htm
I have yet to locate the correct parentage for my Catherine Graham, unfortunately but I'd rather her have no parents than incorrect parents, naturally. Thank you!
Diane French ... you might want to create your own "unknown parents" for Catherine, and then ask that they be set as "Master Profiles". That way you will be able to control (accept or reject) any merging into those parental profiles.
Some time ago I mentioned a problem with the Baker line. I know my line went back to Francis Baker and Twining. But somehow something changed in my line... I said to someone on here, that I would go back and re-do my line, as soon as i got home and as soon as I had a computer. Well, I am back and am going to re-add my line, and will provide the source. I am sorry I do not remember who I had the conversation with on here. Nor do i remember exactly what was said, only that I am going back to my source and will reproduce it.
David Moyson, PM me a link to the profile you want to disconnect and I can tell you what to do If I am unable to disconnect the ex directly
Experts on Lathrop line... How can we fix this?
http://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000002249499602?to=6000000015...
regards, Sally T R
I just received a message through Geni from this person bensonkuvie@yahoo.com. It is apparently someone trying to get money. How can Geni make sure this does not happen again? This is the second time my Geni account has been compromised.
Use the report option.
With over 7 million users the spam level on Geni is quite low, but when you get some, please report it as spam as soon as possible.
You can report spam posted in public discussions and projects as well, but you should probably let the curators handle the discussions spam because they can immediately hide the message when they report it, and also suspend the user if needed.
i could use some help getting the people on my tree fixed. i have too many karen barretts and jennifer barrets and sarah barrets on the tree. please some one help me weed them out a bit. i added extras before checking if they were already here, i apologize, but i want to make it right.
Karen Lee Barrett
Private
Private
I have a similar problem with my children, as they had to create their own account after I had sent them an invite and I can't remove either the profile I made or their own. My daughter said she tried to but now when she logs in she is listed as a stepdaughter.
Private User
Brian R Jacobs
James R Jacobs
Deborah & Roger
both of you,should stack the profiles,and ask for a merge on them.
and then,let the other manager be aware of the merge issue.
so that they also can axept it.
since there is several copy`s here,and several managers.
you both need to be in the other managers family groupe,to solve this issue.
oj... got another possible merge, just do not like the numbers... but looks ok otherwise. What do you all think re: John Atwood (Wood) Any Wood workers out there? :-)
http://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000013698931916?return=duplic...
And back to the Tallman problem, or at least I think it is a merge problem. Got 2 Peters that are a conflict. One Peter b. in 1623 the other 1607... I am sure that either the date on 1607 is wrong, or that the 1607 just does not belong there. Anyone? What should be done, do you think?
http://www.geni.com/family-tree/index/6000000001232036304?resolve=6...
Actually there are three Peter Tallmans/Talman..who do we choose?
http://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000014202718924?return=duplic...
http://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000007316326390?return=duplic...
Angus, is there not a way we can agree to merge these 2 Peter Tallman's b. 1623 without compromising the parentage, which we already know is not resovable? The parentage of Peter Tallman 1623 is where the problem lies, so i do not see why the Peters cannot be merged without touching the problem of the parentage. We all know that this Peter Tallman b. in 1623 is certainly not the same as one Peter Tallman born in 1607.
http://www.geni.com/family-tree/index/6000000007316326390?highlight...
Can someone please remind me... Who is it that has been working on the Baker line? I just do not remember. I have 2 sources, and they do not jive. One is Descendants of Francis Baker of Yarmouth by Bertha W. Clark, 1951, taken from the Rhode Island Historical Society. The other is from the baker family records by J. Montgomery Seaver pub by the American Historical Genealogical Society , Philadelphia. Does any one else have any other sources?
I really would like so much to make corrections, and get the thingt straight, if at all possible. In other words, I would welcome other input from other sources, as direct as possible.
According to the Seaver Rpt. there are several lines of Bakers that came in all along the same time.
1. The Edward Baker line settling in Saugus area, 1630
2. The Richard Baker line settling in the Dorchester area, 1635
3. The Thomas Baker line settling in the Milford, New Haven Ct, 1639
4. The Francis Baker line settling in Yarmouth, MA, came in on the "planter" in 1635
Would someone please look at this tree. ca 1700s with many private profiles an the manager shows no recent activity.
http://www.geni.com/family-tree/index/6000000002998939398