Thomas Pouncey Page /Weopemeok/Jaupin/Yeopim Indian - Dates

Начала Debbie Gambrell вчера
Показаны все сообщения (8)
вчера в 11:22 до полудня

I was tracing a DNA match on Ancestry who is a descendant of a connecting line to my Pouncey line. In tracing that, I realized that this Thomas is showing a half-brother also named Thomas attached to the same father but with different mothers. Initially I wondered if the two brothers were duplicates needing merging, but then I realized this Thomas, who is my ancestor, shows he was born February 07, 1679. I find it highly unlikely he's the son of John Pouncey who was born in 1595. That would make John 84 when this Thomas was born.

вчера в 11:40 до полудня

I found this and don't know if it helps: https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KN19-RDN

вчера в 1:08 после полудня

I don't rely much on Family Search. There are so seldom any sources or documentation provided. It's just people adding profiles from other sites, seems like. But thanks for checking, because sometimes there's actually something useful.

вчера в 3:01 после полудня

Notes in profile are:

Pouncey were tithable taxed as FPOC in New Kent census of 1666 in household of Thomas Pouncey,

This doesn’t indicate parentage.

вчера в 5:33 после полудня

Yep, probably related but not father-son, based on the dates, is my thought.

вчера в 10:45 после полудня

Disputed relationship:

Thomas Pouncey Page /Weopemeok/Jaupin/Yeopim Indian was tithable taxed as FPOC in New Kent census of 1666 in household of John Pouncey

This doesn’t indicate parentage.


вчера в 10:52 после полудня

The birth & death dates for Thomas Pouncey Page /Weopemeok/Jaupin/Yeopim Indian were the ones for Thomas Page, Jr. So I removed the Page man’s dates.

Сегодня в 9:25 до полудня

Thanks for helping with this, Erica.

Показаны все сообщения (8)

Зарегистрируйтесь или войдите в систему чтобы участвовать в этом обсуждении