Jean Estur - Estur Hampshire Notes inc Medieval

Started by Private User on Saturday, December 29, 2018
Problem with this page?

Participants:

  • Private User
    Geni Pro

Profiles Mentioned:

  • Public Domain and https://openclipart.org/detail/1952/flowering-tree
    Geni member

Related Projects:

Showing all 3 posts

CP 25/1/204/11, number 24.
Link: Image of document at AALT
County: Hampshire.
Place: Westminster.
Date: 3 weeks after the feast of St Michael, 54 Henry III [20 October 1270].
Before: Martin de Litlebir', M. Roger de Seyton.
Parties: Walter de Insula, plaintiff, and Matilda Estur', defendant.
Property: 1 messuage and 1 carucate, with appurtenances, Nettlestone [in St Helens] (Noteleston) and Westbrook [in St Helens] (Westbrok'), whence a plea of warranty of charter was summoned between them in the court.
Agreement: Matilda acknowledged that the tenement and appurtenances belonged by right to Walter as her gift. In return, Walter granted Matilda the tenement, with appurtenances, for her to hold for life of Walter and the heirs of his body, paying annually 1d. at Easter for all service, custom and exaction. After the death of Matilda, the tenement will revert intact to Walter and his aforesaid heirs, to be held of the heirs of Matilda, in perpetuity, paying annually 1d. at the Nativity of St John the Baptist, for all service, suit of court, custom and exaction. If Walter happens to die without an heir of his body, the entire tenement, with appurtenances, will pass to Walter brother of that Walter and the heirs of his body to be held of the heirs of Matilda, for the said service, in perpetuity. The heirs of Matilda will provide warranty for Walter de Insula and his heirs or Walter brother of Walter de Insula and his heirs if Walter de Insula dies without an heir of his body, for the tenement with appurtenances, for the said service, against all men, in perpetuity. If Walter de Insula and his brother Walter die without an heir of their bodies, then the whole tenement will revert to the right heirs of Matilda, to be held of the chief lords of that fee for the service pertaining to that tenement, in perpetuity.

CP 25/1/204/11, number 55.
Link: Image of document at AALT
County: Hampshire.
Place: Winchester.
Date: 8 days after St Hillary's Day, 56 Henry III [20 January 1272].
Before: [as 26]
Parties: Walter son of Matilda de Estur, senior, plaintiff, and Ralph de Colevile and Mabel, his wife, defendants.
Property: A messuage and 19 acres, with appurtenances, in Westbrook [in St Helens] (Westbroke), Appley [in St Helens] (Appeley) and Westhay [in St Helens] (Westhey), whence a plea of warranty of charter was summoned between them in that court.
Agreement: Ralph and Mabel acknowledged that the tenement, with appurtenances, belonged by right to Walter as their gift, for Walter and his heirs to hold of Ralph, Mabel and her heirs, in perpetuity, paying annually 1 rose at the feast of St John the Baptist for all service, custom and exaction pertaining to Ralph, Mabel and her heirs, and doing for the chief lords of that fee, on behalf of Ralph, Mabel and her heirs all other service pertaining to that tenement. Ralph, Mabel and her heirs will provide warranty for Walter and his heirs for the said tenement, with appurtenances, for the said service, against all men, in perpetuity. In return, Walter gave Ralph and Mabel an unmewed sparrowhawk.

CP 25/1/204/11, number 80.
Link: Image of document at AALT
County: Hampshire.
Place: Winchester.
Date: 8 days after the feast of St Hillary, 56 Henry III [20 January 1272].
Before: [as 26]
Parties: Matilda de Estur', plaintiff, represented by John de Houton, win or lose, and Robert de Riper and Alice, his wife, defendants.
Property: 1 messuage, 36 acres, with appurtenances, in Copnor [in Portsmouth] (Coupenore), whence a plea of warranty of charter was summoned between them in that court.
Agreement: Robert and Alice acknowledged that the messuage and land, with appurtenances, belonged by right to Matilda as their gift. Matilda and her heirs will hold it of Robert and Alice and her heirs, in perpetuity, paying annually a rose at the feast of the Nativity of St John the Baptist, for all service custom and exaction pertaining to Robert, Alice and her heirs, and doing for the chief lords of that fee, on behalf of Robert, Alice and her heirs, all other services pertaining to that messuage and land. Robert, Alice and her heirs will provide warranty for Matilda and her heirs, for the messuage, land and appurtenances, for the said service, against all men, in perpetuity. In return, Matilda gave Robert and Alice 40 pounds.

http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_204_11....

One branch appears to have settled in Havant, co, Hants, temp. Elizabeth, in the person of Peter Estur, the son of Richard, and nephew of Honneste-personne Mychaell Estur, tutor to Lord William Gray. These facts are elicited by documents referring to property of this last named individual, sealed by the then mayor of Southampton, now in the possession of Philip Langlois, Esq.

https://archive.org/details/armorialofjersey00paynrich/page/192

The manor of WOOLVERTON in Shorwell was probably represented in 1086 by ULWARCOMBE, belonging to William son of Stur, (fn. 71) who had formerly held it of Edward the Confessor. The overlordship followed the descent of Gatcombe (q.v.) in the de Estur family.

Juran was the immediate tenant of the manor under William son of Stur in 1086. (fn. 72) The family of Woolverton, who took their name from this holding and were perhaps descendants of Juran, held the manor from at least the 13th century. Thus John de Woolverton was in possession in 1293, (fn. 73) and in a survey of about the same date he or another John de Woolverton was holding an eighth part of a fee of the overlord. Ralph de Woolverton, knight of the shire in 1327, was probably his descendant. (fn. 74)

The manor subsequently descended by marriage to the Dingley family. The first of this family which came into the Island in the reign of Richard II 'matched with ye daughter and heyre of that auntient familye Ralfe de Wolverton,' says Oglander, 'by whom they nowe injoye Wolverton.' (fn. 75) About 1394 James and Richard Dingley and others bought the manor of Robert Dingley and Margaret his wife. (fn. 76) Ralf Dingley was owner of the manor in 1431, (fn. 77) and Lewis Dingley was holding in the reign of Henry VII when there was a dispute as to his right to a certain villein 'pertaining to the said manor.' (fn. 78) John Dingley was holding Woolverton in 1557 and died in 1596, leaving the manor to his wife Elizabeth for life and the remainder in trust for John Dingley his grandson. (fn. 79) Elizabeth died in 1598 and the manor remained in the same family throughout the next century, when it was acquired by the Hunt family. In 1704 Maurice Hunt conveyed the manor to Anthony Morgan. (fn. 80)

https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/hants/vol5/pp278-284

Showing all 3 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion