It looks like Geni has 15 children for Rev Gershom when we should have 13
https://trees.wmgs.org/getperson.php?personID=I9384&tree=Schirado
So, not so bad.
It looks like Geni has 15 children for Rev Gershom when we should have 13
https://trees.wmgs.org/getperson.php?personID=I9384&tree=Schirado
So, not so bad.
Erica Howton - To me, it is obvious that the pile of children for Rev. Gershom Hobart was built from this database.
However, given https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-XKGQ-9CT?i=60&cc=2... (1675 records for Boston) showing Hephzibah as the daughter of Gershom and Sarah, why does it have Elizabeth with that date? A few pages later, Dorothy appears.
We know that the reverend did not arrive in Groton until 1679. We also know that the relationship between the people and him was tumultuous. Other than Joanna being born in Groton, do we have verifiable proof of the others?
Let's focus on Hepzibah.
The 13 children listed for Gershom Hobart are in multiple places, I just selected a "clean" sourced genealogy. And, I'll leave it to namesake (:)) Dean Richard Hobart to help take a closer look.
I'm having trouble with Hepzibah (Hobart) as wife of Joseph Chilson
Your reference is for her birth, not her marriage. What's the record for Joseph Chilson, and where?
I found a marriage intent reference but it doesn't give a maiden name. They married in Attleboro in 1703.
https://www.geni.com/documents/view?doc_id=6000000207884979979
Joseph Chilson was born in Lynn. I've posted the links for him that I could find near the bottom of the "About" tab.
The 1952 Hobart book from the Ca Genelogical Society has the same 13 children as that link (although Hepzibah and Gershom, Jr. are at different places - the other names have same order).. Oh, and that 1952 book has Unknown for wife 1 and Rebecca Ibrook for wife 2. In 1992 was when Anderson documented that it was Elizabeth Ibrook.
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Chilson-213 says Hepsibah from intentions and then Sarah White of Mendon
https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/27V8-DP6/joseph-chilson-1670-... says Hepsibah from intentions and Sarah Cheney of Mendon. Maybe Sarah married at least twice.
I can't readily locate anyone who says if wife Hepsibah is proven to be Gershom's daughter. Other than time and place and families that were socializing together.
Dean Richard Hobart - I found the Boston birth ledger on Family Search that proves that Hephzibah was the first born of Gershom & Sarah. See https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-XKGQ-9CT?i=60&cc=2....
My takeaway so far.
Here's the book Dean mentioned.
Hobart, Edgar. Hobart genealogy : the descendants of Edmund Hobart of Hingham, Mass. (1952, San Francisco, Calif. : California Genealogical Society). Page 14. < Archive.Org >
(No Hepzibah; the 1675/6 birth is listed as Elizabeth, in Groton).
I'll attach to profiles.
Sorry, Hepzibah Hobart "is" listed as a daughter of Gershom & Sarah, but without a birth date & location. I expect the genealogists did not collate with City Record of Boston.
https://www.geni.com/documents/view?doc_id=6000000207892144834
I'll fix whatever duplicates are making it 16 children instead of 13, but I see no reason not to accept this study as valid.
Yet another new user (started December 2023) adding profiles in the Washington line - https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000008211776777&src=profile&cmp=btn (George Washington, 1st President of the United States). Profiles in the new tree include the parents, siblings, spouse and step-children.
John Augustine Washington has another match - John Augustine Washington - that adds an unknown son - Bartlett 'Bartly' Washington (added in 2022). I found this because of the first match.
Erica Howton and Emily Kent Marget That 1952 hobart book is the most comprehensive about Edmund Hobart's descendants, but there are some errors and omissions (*but not many). Anything more recent will be research on individuals that reference that book. The Hobart and Hubbard family books written in the late 1800s, when Garrit A. Hobart was VP under McKinley get a lot of the Hubbards and Hobarts mixed up.
As to Hubbard and Hobart. For some unknown reason, most of Edmund Hobart's descendants used Hobart for 'official' and 'formal' writing and then used Hubbard more for close family members or casual writing in private journals, letters, etc. A couple of his grandsons and great grandsons started officially using Hubbard, but most all use Hobart.
For Hubbard, the opposite was true of the descendants of George Hubbard of CT, who in many old genealogies mistakenly have him as the older/first son of Edmund Hobart of Hingham, or a cousin. All never proven and with little, if any, interaction between family groups. His profile is here. George Hubbard, of Wethersfield
Most of Hubbards and Hobarts today come from those 2 men. The overlap in naming stopped mostly by the late 1600s as the 1st to 3rd immigrant generations died off but still continued in older public records, town history/meeting notes, etc. Most all in those 2 families read and wrote since the 1600s, even if they were farmers, but most were solidly middle class tradesmen, preachers, university professors, lawyers, surveyors, etc. So the change in spelling is thought to have been intentional.
Although there were some Hubbards into Virginia, they didn't expand much. A couple of Hobarts can be traced from early Colonial Massachusetts (grandkids/great grand kids of Edmund who went BACK to England for the Civil War in 1650s, and then went to Ireland. [later re-emmigrated in the 1840s due to the famine]. Some small family groups came from England in the 1880s due to economics.
As they migrated west, those families sometimes cross in NY, PA, and OH, but rarely, if ever, intermarried.
As to
In my opinion - the merge request would bring parents in to the tree, we already discussed we would need documentation to prove her parents - the tree being brought in has no documentation to prove her parentage.
I wouldn't approve this merge -- A curator needs to review and reverse or what they decided.
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000002980001396?return=merge...
In my opinion, this is exactly why we should go ahead with the merge or request:
Caution: Relationships are locked on the master profile for Sarah ‘Valentine’ (unknown) Bracewell. Merging into this profile will automatically disconnect the immediate family of Sarah Valentine (Sampson) Bracewell.
I'll go further and lock relationships on unproven parents James Sampson, III & Elizabeth Sampson
After sourcing them better. Moves from Massachusetts to Virginia in this period is unusual at best.
After sourcing them better. Moves from Massachusetts to Virginia in this period is unusual at best.
Oops, London to Virginia. Updated the curator note for Sarah Bracewell the "abouts" for her fake parents, and added more locks.
For those curious, her origins are a "Braswell Myth." See https://braswellgenealogy.blogspot.com/2007/10/james-sampson-will-i...
NOTE: James Sampson (wife Elizabeth Barcroft) is often referred to as the father of Sarah, wife of Richard Braswell the 1st, yet there is no mention of a Sarah Braswell in this will. Richard & Sarah followed Braswell naming patterns yet it is evident by their wills they did not name children James, Sampson, or Elizabeth. There are no records to indicate that Sarah's surname was Sampson. It is another Braswell Myth.
Dean Richard Hobart - thank you for the precis on Hobart v Hubbard. I didn't realize it was a Hubbard v Hobart as well.
It made me think of the high literacy rate in next generation 17th century New England - I remember reading at some point, more than 90%? And much more than England. It's in the "pioneer west" generations that literacy declined.
Cynthia Curtis, A183502, US7875087
Jannett (or Genot) McFarland is a question re: descendant Jean Mcfarlane married to Donald Cameron, of Salachry
Of which marriage i expect to be a GEDCOM mixup. I will probably merge and detach Jeanne, and open a discussion on Allan Cameron.
Erica Howton If you are looking for Hubbard, that base reference is the book 1,000 Years of Hubbard from 1895. Many have since been expanded and or found to be different, but is the typical starting point in a broad since. interestingly, the Hubbards in the English section are many times Hobart still in England, while the Hubbards in that book in the US tend to be always Hubbards.
Edmund Hobart and family are included for Hingham "branch", although it has the parents wrong (the Great Snoring Hobarts who had a son Edward bp 1573 (and married in early 1600s and lived in England with his wife and kids. Many people say, oh, Edward meant Edmund!, but Edmund of Hingham never used Edward (and it wasn't a common name among his descendants). I think the baptism is latin Edwardius or something. Edmund's son Peter, a prominent reverand in Mass and later help start the Unitarian Church there used Hubbard a lot with personal family members in his day to day diary, which people reference for many 'public records' in early 1600s.
Online at a number of sources, and here
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:One_Thousand_Years_of_Hubbard_H...
Erica Howton Also, re the Virginia / New England connection. It seems that when a son moved to Virginia from New England, he was a shipper (many times a slaver) who came from the major port cities like Providence RI and Salem, MA. They would do a round robin between NE, Bermuda/Bahamas, and major southern ports in VA and SC. Typically it is just one of the sons who ended up there more full time.
At least it seems that way when sorting through mixed ups with same name, Rarely did they start in the South or Mid Atlantic and then migrate to NE to run a branch shipping office. It seems more often one of the family members went south to handle business there (the 2nd or 3rd son).
Seems earlier it was Maine (due to the presence of fisheries and whaling) but later in the 1700s for general trade and slaving ships. NE products down to VA and SC and on to Bermuda, then back with rum and slaves to the South in route back to NE.