The Curator Note for Ragnvald Óláfsson, King of Vestfold reads "Ragnvald Olafsson, NOT Gudrødsson".
This suggests to me that users have previously altered the ancestry of Ragnvald to match the Fragmentary Annals of Ireland which names "Gofraid/Gothfraid, son of Ragnall, son of Gothfraid Conung, son of Gofraid" in reference to the father of Imar and Amlaib and Auisie.
The question i have, which i can't find an answer to in the profile Abouts, is why do we think Ragnvald Olafsson is the father of Gotfraid Ragnallsson when the only record we seem to have for the relationship shows that Gotfraid/Gudrod's father's name should be Ragnall Gudrodsson?
Are the Annals wrong? If so I think we need to explain that in the Abouts of both men.
Charles Cawley comments:-
"Gofraid/Gothfraid" cannot be linked to any of the main contemporary Norwegian rulers who are shown in the document NORWAY KINGS, although it should be borne in mind that the government of Norway was fragmented at the time with numerous local rulers in different parts of the country who probably all referred to themselves as kings.
Now Wikipedia (who i am loathe to rely on) use the words "petty king" to describe Rognvald Olafsson so perhaps he is not important enough to be on Cawley's radar? Except that on the NORWAY KINGS Cawley does indeed list Rognvald Olafsson without indication what so ever that there might even exist speculation in academic circles that Rognvald Olafsson is Gotfraid's father.
Unless there is another source that i am unaware of or a tradition of scholarship that links Gotfraid to Ragnvald Olafsson I think we should sever the relationship and give Gotfraid a new set of ancestors.