Aletta Maria Potgieter, b1c6d4e6 - ALERT - Aletta Maria Potgieter mix up in SAG v8

My source DP on page 607 has b1c1 Antonie Michael 1779 married to Johanna Catharina du Preez
and
b2c1 Anthony Michael 1771 married to Aletta Maria Potgieter

I have it as ---
b1c6d4e6 Aletta Maria Potgieter » 5.10.1794
b1c8d1e1 Maria Potgieter» 12.4.1778, x Anthonie Michiel Muller
b1c8d1e7 Aletta Maria Potgieter » 31.10.1790, x Thomas Ignatius Ferreira
b2c1 Anthony Michael Muller » 24.3.1771, v. Riversdal, later v. Uitenhage, x Aletta Maria Portgieter, † 1850
Wilhelmina Hendrina 黃瑋婷 Potgieter
Sal jy asseblief vir my kyk.
I have send an e-mail.
If I get the time today I will have a look in the Ferreira and Muller registers I have.
Juds

Maybe we should just quote our sources and dates

SAG vol 5 p 714 states
b1c5 Antonie Michael » 24.1.1779 x Kaapstad 15.1.1804 Johanna Catharina DU PREEZ d.v. Andries du Preez en Hester Ferreira xx Graaff-Reinet 2.5.1813 Aletta Maria POTGIETER » 5.10.1794 d.v. Cornelis Potgieter en Rachel Lea Meyer

here b1c5 x Aletta Maria on SAG vol 8 p 218
or b1c6d4e6 Aletta Maria ≈ Graaff-Reinet 5.10.1794 (ander bron
22.9.1794) x Graaff-Reinet 2.5.1813 Anthonie Michael MULLER

It agrees with Peter on the name Michael and both wives but differs and states that both Michaels are b1c5.

SAG Vol 5 p 715 states 
b2c1 Antonie Michiel » 24.3.1771 † Uitenhage 21.1.1843 x Aletta Maria POTGIETER » 12.4.1778 † 1850 d.v. Johannes Potgieter en Agatha Catharina Meyer 


here b2c1 x Aletta Maria on SAG Vol 8 p 253
or b1c8d1e1 Aletta Maria * Rondebosch ≈ Swellendam 12.4.1778 †
“Olifantshoek”, Alexandria 23.7.1850 x Graaff-Reinet
2.5.1813 Anthonie Michiel MULLER ≈ 24.3.1771,
burger Swellendam † Uitenhage 21.1.1843 s.v.
Cornelius Johannes Muller en Susanna Elisabeth
Ferreira

There is also sufficient proof (Marie’s baptism registers and Charlene’s MOOC 
NO 7/1/171) that her name is actually Maria

{ note however here that the MOOC named him Michael
Likewise MOOC 
NO 7/1/202 and MOOC 
NO 6/9/51 also named him Michael but it is clear from the context that they refer to this couple.

Maybe we must just verify from the detail in the MOOC whether our inferences are correct }

Judi your references agree with SAG vols 5 & 8

Moved and cleaned up duplicate profiles. Pse shout if anything looks suspect.
Charlene is your 1850 MOOC correctly classified in the light of Judi's feedback?

Dankie Daan vir die opruimingswerk. Ek het 'n probleem met my internet, kom skaars 'n paar minute op Geni en dan bom dit uit.

Baie dankie vir al julle harde puzzle en uitsortering