I deeply respect people who have the guts to nominate for such an difficult job as to be the president of the VS, but he/she does that only some years of her/his life. I really doubt it necessary in a project like geni where you can discover how also very not known people can have done very brave movements and made so intelligent decisions in their lives. What are you opiniions about this subject?
both, maybe. Why is the titel in the name? there are enough places where you can put once's experiences of life or you can even make a project to put them together with all the appropriate documentation and URL's to other places on the internet about the work they and others in their offcies e/o neighbourhood made to change our world. groetjes, jMu = jeannette.
Jeannette, major honorifics traditionally become a part of someone's name or title. For example, we wouldn't call Queen Elizabeth II of England just "Elizabeth," because that is not how she is known. Likewise, former presidents always retain the courtesy title of "President of the United States." The same is true with military rank like "General" or "Sgt."), professional titles (like "Dr." or "Rev."), nobility titles (like "Sir" or "Duchess"), and so on.
The display name isn't mean to describe someone's entire life; that is what the "About Me" field is for. So it's not being used in display names as a biography, but rather because that is indeed the person's title.